<menu id="6ok4w"><strong id="6ok4w"></strong></menu>
<menu id="6ok4w"></menu>
  • 現在位置是:首 頁 >> 急診學科 >> 院前急救 >> 推薦文章
    關鍵字:
    推薦文章

        字體: | |

    機械與人工胸外按壓
    原作者: Semhar Tewelde, 肖鋒譯 發布日期:2013-09-11

    fTitle: Mechanical vs. Manual Chest Compressions
    題目:機械與人工胸外按壓
    Author 作者: Semhar Tewelde

    A recent meta–analysis of 12 studies (6,538 patients with 1,824 ROSC) assessed the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using either manual vs. mechanical (load-distributing or piston-driven) compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    最近的一項薈萃??分析報告對12項用人工和機械(負荷均勻按壓帶或驅動活塞)按壓心肺復蘇(CPR)的院外心臟驟停研究(6,538例1,824 ROSC)進行了質量評估 。
    Compared w/manual CPR, load-distributing band CPR had significantly greater odds of ROSC (odds ratio, 1.62 and p<0.001)
    與手動CPR心肺復蘇相比,負荷均勻按壓帶可明顯提高ROSC(比值比為1.62,P <0.001)
    The treatment effect for piston-driven CPR was similar to manual CPR
    活塞驅動CPR的治療效果與人工心肺復蘇類似
    The difference in percentages of ROSC rates from CPR was 8.3% for load-distributing band CPR and 5.2% for piston-driven CPR
    負荷均勻按壓帶CPR心肺復蘇ROSC率的差異百分比為8.3%,而活塞驅動CPR 為5.2%
    Compared with manual CPR, combining both mechanical CPR devices produced a significant treatment effect in favor of higher odds of ROSC with mechanical CPR devices (odds ratio, 1.53 and p<0.001)
    與人工心肺復蘇相比,這兩個機械心肺復蘇儀的應用產生了顯著的增加ROSC的治療效果(比值比為1.53,P<0.001)

    References 參考文獻:
    Westfall M, Krantz S, Mullin C, Kaufman C. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2013 Jul; 41(7):1782-9

    ?